With cryptocurrencies gaining traction and entering the mainstream, financial regulators are assessing the risks related to financial crimes like money laundering and terrorist financing. The question is how crypto firms can design and implement a solution that essentially improves their oversight on transactions and transfers of digital currencies.
Crypto firms not only need to analyse the risks associated with their customers but also need to consider the upcoming trends, use cases, and regulatory updates. That’s not all, the biggest challenge is the threats emerging from anonymous transactions made through crypto wallets or Bitcoin ATMs.
Cryptocurrencies and AML Compliance
Cryptocurrencies are growing in terms of both popularity and adoption with innovations in the technology that makes the financial system work. However, these developments do not come without risks, as financial experts believe that the main weak point of the digital currency sector is the lack of sufficient AML compliance regulations. Initially, the best practices to prevent fraud and eliminate money laundering in the crypto sector seem to be the same as those implemented by traditional banks and financial institutions.Â
That being said, the most fundamental step toward combating financial crimes is a risk-based approach that helps the given crypto firm detect fraudulent entities before they affect any of their operations. Considering the repetitive regulatory updates for the crypto sector, it is even more important for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to implement a risk-based approach. For instance, criminal activities like money muling are a common problem for all businesses dealing in any kind of monetary transaction.
Challenges Faced by Crypto Firms
By far the biggest challenge that crypto firms face is the added risk of the methods used by financial criminals like money launderers to make anonymous transactions, including off-chain transactions. Another concern is the loyalty of the employees working at crypto firms, which becomes a problem because the salary expectation of experience compliance officials is higher than what a growing crypto firm offers. No matter what position an official is working on, it is equally important for them to consider AML requirements and analyse the risks associated with their customers’ transactions.Â
In particular, employees that are directly involved with matters that can be questioned by regulators must consider all relevant pain points. With the growth of crypto firms, compliance professionals need to determine the potential conflicts within teams and manage the communication with stakeholders so that everyone is on the same page.Â
Furthermore, there are other crucial aspects of crypto operations including the technologies to be used. It often happens that crypto firms that aren’t well-established deploy tech solutions that are based on the concept of one solution for every problem. For this reason, instead of looking for automation and outsourcing operations, crypto firms must incorporate robust solutions for identity verification, AML screening, and transaction monitoring.
Crypto AML Regulations
AML regulations that are imposed on crypto firms throughout the world are more or less similar in the sense that the global trends in the crypto sector are the same. Crypto firms that operate in more than one country or jurisdiction need to analyse the slight difference in trends of both the markets.Â
US and Canada’s Crypto AML RegulationsÂ
In the US, the 2020 Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) included service providers that deal with virtual assets and digital assets within the scope of the Bank Secrecy Act. After the implementation, crypto regulations in the US are coming in at a fast pace. In March this year, President Biden signed an Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets (EO). Similarly, Canada’s crypto service providers are considered issuers of securities, and dealers in virtual currencies must register as money service businesses (MSBs). Additional requirements are set out in Canada’s Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Regulations (PCMLTFRs) impose additional requirements.
