Shufti-Sphere-Website-Banner
burger-menu cross-icon-2

Resources

us

216.73.216.48

One integration for every identity format: rethinking digital identity verification.

One integration for every identity format

TL;DR

  • Regulated EU firms must accept the EUDI Wallet for strong authentication by late December 2027.
  • Identity now arrives in five formats at once, and the integration model decides who keeps up.
  • Wiring up one format at a time multiplies maintenance work, vendor handoffs, and onboarding drop-off.
  • One integration layer can accept physical IDs, national digital IDs, EUDI Wallets, NFC chips, and QES.

In May 2024, Regulation (EU) 2024/1183 brought the European Digital Identity framework into force and reset what “an ID” means for any business that onboards EU users. A passport scan used to be the whole job. Now the same onboarding flow has to handle a national digital identity, the chip inside an e-passport, a wallet credential on a phone, and a legally binding electronic signature, often for the same person across different sessions. The format a user shows up with is no longer your decision. This piece argues that the integration model you choose, not the individual check, is what now separates teams that keep pace from teams that fall behind.

What does digital identity verification mean when identity has no single format?

Digital identity verification is the process of confirming that a person is who they claim to be, using documents, biometrics, database checks, or cryptographic credentials, without an in-person meeting. The definition has not changed. What changed is the input. A single user can now prove identity with a physical document, a government-issued digital ID, an EU Digital Identity Wallet, an NFC chip read, or a Qualified Electronic Signature.

That shift matters because most verification systems were designed around one input and retrofitted for the rest. A flow built to read a driver’s licence does not natively accept a wallet credential. A flow built for wallets cannot fall back to a forensic document check when a user has no wallet yet. The result is a stack that handles the format it was born for and degrades on everything else. The failure mode is predictable: a user with a perfectly valid credential abandons onboarding because your system only speaks one language.

The identity formats your users will actually present

Five distinct identity formats are now in active use across the EU, and a user can present any of them depending on their country, device, and the service they are accessing. Treating these as one category is where most onboarding designs go wrong, because each carries a different capture method, trust level, and regulatory weight.

Identity format

What it is

Where will you see it

Physical IDs

Passports, national ID cards, driver’s licences, residence permits, captured by photo or scan

Universal fallback, still the majority of global onboarding

National digital IDs

Government-issued digital identity schemes are verified against authoritative databases

Nordics, India, the Netherlands, and other mature digital-ID markets

EUDI Wallets

A mobile credential under eIDAS 2.0 that holds verified attributes and shares them on request

Rolling out across all 27 EU member states through 2026

NFC chip verification

Reading the secure chip embedded in e-passports and e-IDs for tamper-evident data

High-assurance onboarding, border-grade identity checks

Qualified Electronic Signatures

A legally binding e-signature with the same standing as a handwritten one under eIDAS 2.0

Contracts, account agreements, high-trust regulated services


The point of the table is not that one format is better. It is that a user does not pick the format your system prefers. Coverage of all five, through the same flow, is what keeps a valid user from becoming a lost conversion.

Digital identity verification: one integration, all IDs — Featured

Why eIDAS 2.0 makes multi-format support non-optional?

eIDAS 2.0 turns multi-format identity from a nice-to-have into a legal obligation with a date attached. Under Regulation (EU) 2024/1183, every EU member state must make at least one EU Digital Identity Wallet available to its citizens and residents, and specified private relying parties that require strong user authentication must accept that wallet as a means of identification. The deadlines are fixed, and they are closing.

Milestone

Timing

What it means

Regulation (EU) 2024/1183 enters into force

20 May 2024

The legal framework for the EUDI Wallet is live

Member states issue wallets

By late 2026

At least one wallet is available to every citizen and resident in each member state

Mandatory acceptance

By late 2027

Specified private relying parties needing strong authentication must accept the wallet

 

The acceptance obligation is the part most teams underestimate. By late 2027, a regulated business cannot tell an EU user that it does not support their wallet, in the same way it cannot refuse a valid passport today. The wallet does not replace document verification. It joins it. According to Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidance on digital identity, firms should take a risk-based approach and rely on identity systems with an appropriate level of trustworthiness at every stage of the process, which means the older formats stay in scope even as wallets arrive. You will be running physical IDs, database checks, NFC reads, and wallet credentials in parallel, not in sequence.

One integration versus many: the architecture decision

The strategic question is no longer “which check do we run?” It is “how many integrations are we willing to own?” Every format added as a separate connector is a separate contract, a separate SDK, a separate failure surface, and a separate thing to keep compliant as the rules move. Teams that treat each new format as its own project accumulate exactly the fragmentation that the regulation was meant to remove.

The cost of integrating one format at a time

Wiring up formats individually looks manageable at first, but compounds badly after that. Each connector has its own update cycle, its own edge cases, and its own owner, and the moment one of them lags a regulatory change, the whole onboarding flow inherits the gap. The engineering cost is visible in the backlog. The hidden cost is conversion: users routed to the wrong handler, sessions that cannot fall back when a credential is missing, and an audit trail stitched across systems that cannot prove the steps belonged to the same verification. When something breaks, the team spends its time finding which connector owns the problem instead of fixing it.

What a single integration layer changes?

A single integration layer flips the model. Instead of routing each format to a different system, one entry point accepts whatever the user presents and applies the right check behind it. The user shows a passport, a wallet, or a chip, and the flow adapts without a separate build for each path. For engineering, that means one API to maintain and one place to absorb a regulatory change rather than five. For compliance, it means one audit trail that holds the whole session together. The format becomes a runtime detail, not an architectural commitment, which is the only way to keep pace with a standard that is still adding formats.

How Shufti handles every identity format through one integration?

If you onboard EU users, you have already felt the pressure: the wallet deadline is fixed, your users still arrive with passports and national IDs, and supporting both without doubling your integration load is the real problem. Most verification systems were built around a single input and bolt the rest on, which is why coverage degrades the moment a user shows up with something the flow was not designed for.

Shufti accepts the full range through one integration: physical IDs, national digital IDs, EUDI Wallets, NFC chip verification, and Qualified Electronic Signatures under eIDAS 2.0, all via a single API. The same connection that runs a forensic document check also accepts a citizen’s wallet credential, with proprietary OCR trained natively on 10,000+ document types across 220+ countries for the formats that are not going anywhere. One platform, fully owned technology, global coverage with real local depth.

See how one integration handles every identity format your EU users present, book a 20-minute demo.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the EUDI Wallet mandatory for businesses?

Acceptance is mandatory for specified private relying parties that require strong user authentication, by late 2027, under Regulation (EU) 2024/1183. It does not replace existing identity checks. Regulated firms will accept wallet credentials alongside physical and database-based verification, not instead of it.

What is the difference between electronic identity verification and document verification?

Document verification authenticates a physical ID by checking its security features and data. Electronic identity verification confirms identity against authoritative databases or digital credentials such as national digital IDs and EUDI Wallets. A complete digital identity verification flow uses both, because users present both.

Does accepting digital identity wallets remove the need for document verification?

No. Wallet adoption will grow through 2026 and 2027, but most users worldwide still verify with a physical document, and many EU users will for years. FATF guidance favours a risk-based approach across formats, so document verification stays a core part of any onboarding flow.

Related Posts

Blog

Deepfakes don’t wait for your vendor’s release cycle

Deepfakes don’t wait for your vendor’s release cycle

Explore More

Blog

Why Owning the KYC Stack Beats Orchestrating It

Why Owning the KYC Stack Beats Orchestrating It

Explore More

Blog

5 Best Veriff Alternatives for Identity Verification in 2026

5 Best Veriff Alternatives for Identity Verification in 2026

Explore More

Blog

Stop Trusting Identity Verification Accuracy Claims. Start Testing Them

Stop Trusting Identity Verification Accuracy Claims. Start Testing Them

Explore More

Blog

The KYC vendor evaluation checklist: how to actually test accuracy claims.

The KYC vendor evaluation checklist: how to actually test accuracy claims.

Explore More

Blog

One integration for every identity format: rethinking digital identity verification.

One integration for every identity format: rethinking digital identity verification.

Explore More

Blog

EUDI Wallet: Is Your Identity Stack Ready for It?

EUDI Wallet: Is Your Identity Stack Ready for It?

Explore More

Blog

Deepfakes don’t wait for your vendor’s release cycle

Deepfakes don’t wait for your vendor’s release cycle

Explore More

Blog

Why Owning the KYC Stack Beats Orchestrating It

Why Owning the KYC Stack Beats Orchestrating It

Explore More

Blog

5 Best Veriff Alternatives for Identity Verification in 2026

5 Best Veriff Alternatives for Identity Verification in 2026

Explore More

Blog

Stop Trusting Identity Verification Accuracy Claims. Start Testing Them

Stop Trusting Identity Verification Accuracy Claims. Start Testing Them

Explore More

Blog

The KYC vendor evaluation checklist: how to actually test accuracy claims.

The KYC vendor evaluation checklist: how to actually test accuracy claims.

Explore More

Blog

One integration for every identity format: rethinking digital identity verification.

One integration for every identity format: rethinking digital identity verification.

Explore More

Blog

EUDI Wallet: Is Your Identity Stack Ready for It?

EUDI Wallet: Is Your Identity Stack Ready for It?

Explore More

Take the next steps to better security.

Contact us

Get in touch with our experts. We'll help you find the perfect solution for your compliance and security needs.

Contact us

Request demo

Get free access to our platform and try our products today.

Get started